Freedom, how long will it last?

Freedom, politics, and how we are losing it.

Strawman Freedom Sovereign Patriot “How To” by: Dario Busch

Posted by admin on March 11th, 2010

dariobusch.com FREEDOM SOVEREINGTY BY LIENING YOUR STRAWMAN WITH 0 BILLION DOLLARS? THE STRAWMAN IS THE LEGAL PERSON WITH YOUR NAME IN ALL-CAPITAL LETTERS WARNING This is usually too weird for people to grasp at first but FREEDOM motivates Living Persons (people), exist in a real world. LEGAL PERSONS (corporations) exist in a fictional world. Governments, Corporations, Agencies, FICTICIOUS CORPORATIONS, etc. are examplesof a LEGAL PERSON. LEGAL PERSONS can only deal directly with other LEGAL PERSONS (agencies, states, etc.) LEGAL PERSONS can not deal directly with Living Persons (You). In order for a LEGAL PERSONS to deal with Living Persons, there must be a connection, a go-between. To establish a connection, a FICTIONAL LEGAL PERSON was deceitfully created by the government. For that purpose, your lawful name of birthright was fraudulently replaced with a LEGAL NAME. Your name in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS is not you, the living flesh and blood person. Your name in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS is the STRAWMAN (a fiction just make belief). This was accomplished without your knowledge by using your birth certificates as the MCO (manufacturers certificate of origin) and the state in which you were born was used as the port of entry. (Admiralty Law – watch the video). The artificial person created by law a with Your Name in ALL-CAPITAL LETTERS is the STRAWMAN. This fraudulent act gives Government a LEGAL PERSON with whom to deal directly. The LEGAL PERSON has Your Name but in ALL

No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)

25 Responses to “Strawman Freedom Sovereign Patriot “How To” by: Dario Busch”

  1. RetSquid Says:

    @FreedomCanada2010

    Don’t get mad and go away, just go away.

  2. RetSquid Says:

    @FreedomCanada2010

    Bad link.

    Post the title.

  3. FreedomCanada2010 Says:

    @RetSquid

    see if you can wrap your little mind around this

    watch?v=8RzVlqCbgU8

  4. FreedomCanada2010 Says:

    done with you bro. too stupid to live

  5. RetSquid Says:

    @FreedomCanada2010

    Obviously, I am FAR more educated than you, I know how to use a dictionary and can do research, you can’t.

    You lose and get mad, just like a twelve year old losing an argument on the playground, now, run home to mommy and cry about it.

  6. RetSquid Says:

    @FreedomCanada2010

    I am using Bouvier’s law dictionary, but I’ve looked and have never seen a definition of a statute that didn’t say that it was a law.

  7. FreedomCanada2010 Says:

    @RetSquid

    fuck you are an idiot .. get educated

    frustrating as fuck trying to talk sense into a fuckin retard .. i am done i should know better .. this fuckin idiot wouldn’t know his ass from a hole in the ground or if it was punched or bored.. fuck off you moron you are too stupid to live

  8. FreedomCanada2010 Says:

    @RetSquid

    that is a 50/50 def9inition i can guarantee you will not find that definition used in any supreme court case ruling .. i however have blacks law 7th edition and this is what it says:

    man i aint going to type it out .. but blacks law 7th edition is what a supreme court judge would haul out or i guess 9th is out but trust me .. there is alot more to what a statute is that the websters dictionary definition you are using.

  9. RetSquid Says:

    @FreedomCanada2010

    The oldest law that really matters in the U.S. is the Constitution, anything else is just used as background information.

  10. RetSquid Says:

    @FreedomCanada2010

    Wrong again, you would ignore the law, challenge it, and/or force it to be changed.

    The Magna Carta has absolutely ZERO force in the Unted States.

    And again you prove my point that a law is a statute.

    Where do people like you get all these wacko ideas from anyways?

  11. FreedomCanada2010 Says:

    @RetSquid

    statutes that go against ANY one of your GOD given freedoms and rights as set down by the magna carta and with precedents that have lasted to 800 years or more!! are NOT LAWFUL.

    therefore it is so obvious to me what a statute is. and obvious to most other people. i can’t understand why you dont get it?

  12. FreedomCanada2010 Says:

    @RetSquid
    ok now take exacly what you just said and apply it to the real world
    a statute is a man made law passed by a bunch of men that are not known to you, we wouldn’t be invited to any of their parties.

    these men pass a law called a statute. Let us say they pass a law that says you no longer are allowed to walk down the street. No walking period. that is the new law passed by legislature.

    How could you fight that law? Let me tell you. you pick up the magna carta WHICH SUPERSEDES ALL!!

  13. RetSquid Says:

    @FreedomCanada2010

    Sorry, the legal definition of a STATUTE: The written will of the legislature, solemnly expressed according to the forms prescribed in the constitution; an act of the legislature.

    2. This word is used in contradistinction to the common law. Statutes acquire their force from the time of their passage unless otherwise provided.

    Statutes have nothing to do with any ‘corporate rules’.

    But, you are Canadian, maybe they do things weird up there.

  14. RetSquid Says:

    @FreedomCanada2010

    I’m not going to spend money debating morons like you, I will continue to use the resources I have. You have yet to use your dictionary anyways.

  15. RetSquid Says:

    @FreedomCanada2010

    Yes ‘they’ can legislate most of your rights away, which is why we have a Contitution to see that it does not happen.

  16. RetSquid Says:

    FreedomCanada2010 (1 day ago) @RetSquid

    “Before a statute becomes law in some countries, it must be agreed upon by the highest executive in the government, and finally published as part of a code. In many countries, statutes are organized in topical arrangements (or “codified”) within publications called codes, such as the United States Code. In the United States, statutory law is distinguished from and subordinate to constitutional law. “

  17. RetSquid Says:

    @FreedomCanada2010

    LOL, you are so proud of your ignorance!!

    YOU already agreed with me that statutes are laws.

    I will repost it so everyone can see.

  18. FreedomCanada2010 Says:

    @RetSquid

    show me where the supreme court used your “law dictionary” in a ruling. I am pretty sure you got that off an internet site.

    I have all 9 editions of black’s law dictionary. the supreme court quotes that dictionary in supreme court rulings. i could care less about some internet dictionary no one uses

  19. FreedomCanada2010 Says:

    @RetSquid

    wow .. your unalienable rights are part of common law.

    you are saying that statues override common law .. therefore they can just legislate away ANY of your rights

    WRONG

  20. FreedomCanada2010 Says:

    @RetSquid

    why would I even look at your channel.

    you cannot even distinguish the difference between Statutes and Laws.

    what would the chances be of finding anything intelligent on your channel if you cannot make such a simple distinction?

    answer: slim to none

  21. RetSquid Says:

    @FreedomCanada2010

    How can you possible think I am an Athiest? Did you even LOOK at my channel? Or are you so stuck in your ignorance you ignore everything that does not fit in YOUR mold?

  22. RetSquid Says:

    @FreedomCanada2010

    Who said ANYTHING about unalienable rights? I didn’t.

  23. RetSquid Says:

    @FreedomCanada2010

    Maybe YOU should learn to read, I gave you the definitions right out of a law dictionary.

  24. FreedomCanada2010 Says:

    @RetSquid

    spend the money educating yourself because the public education system did you an incredible disservice while you went to school

    as for statues being laws, laws are a loose term thrown around alot

    Statues are defined as rules with THE FORCE OF LAW. they are commonly referred to as laws but they are not true laws in the legal sense of the word

    they are corporate rules that have the FORCE OF LAW behind them.

    Big difference

  25. FreedomCanada2010 Says:

    i just realized why retsquid cannot comprehend anything that i am saying.

    he is an atheist! there is no hope for you if you think that your entire being was a random chance of a lighting strike in a puddle of primordial soup.

    you need the government to rule you. you have no higher power other than government.

    you are the perfect zombie for the government to rule over

    sucks to be you

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 
SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline
Powered by WP VideoTube