Cheryl Gallant (MP) takes note in detail of how the Firearms Act violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and violates constitutional rights. The opposition’s questions that follow are more of a temper-tantrum then an actual rebuttal, in classic anti-gun style. Also, a reference is made again to the support that the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police and their support for the long gun registry. Correct me if I am wrong, but are these guys not part of the Coalition for Gun Control, a political lobby group hell bent on disarming Canadian citizens? I’d take the word of front line cops over a politically motivated lobby group any day. FANTASTIC presentation MP Cheryl Gallant and thank you for pointing out how hunters and sport shooters are “criminalized” by the Firearms Act in every sense of the word.

Cheryl Gallant (MP) takes note in detail of how the Firearms Act violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and violates constitutional rights. The opposition’s questions that follow are more of a temper-tantrum then an actual rebuttal, in classic anti-gun style. Also, a reference is made again to the support that the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police and their support for the long gun registry. Correct me if I am wrong, but are these guys not part of the Coalition for Gun Control, a political lobby group hell bent on disarming Canadian citizens? I’d take the word of front line cops over a politically motivated lobby group any day. FANTASTIC presentation MP Cheryl Gallant and thank you for pointing out how hunters and sport shooters are “criminalized” by the Firearms Act in every sense of the word.

This is an educative poem/rap of the Human rights acts 1998. It starts from Article 2 to 14, also includes the first 3 protocols. Article 16 – 18 are not included…….Unfortunately. Manner ganna spit about the European convention human right Act This regulates 47 states, teaches them how to Act Responsible, accordingly. To ensure fair and non discriminatory mentality Yeah i mean the 1998 establishment Basically, it governance vs government Who should have the duty, simply for it to be effectively? It had to have exhausted all domestic remedies Yeah i mean state legislation 6 months to bring suit to the application This condition relies on a violation of the Strasbourg’s convention 17 grand chamber 7 chamber 47 judges no grudges . Right to life That like saying you have the right to live The government have the right to give, Everyone the right to live Prohibition of torture, if i see ya, u know ill torch ya Actually i bound by the Prohibition of torture Instead safe. Prohibition of slavery and forced labour, If i see you in trouble, i will save ya Don’t let No man take you to no labour This anit No Party, (lol labour party, get it) you have the Right for liberty and security Chorus Right to a fair trial………………… I’ll look at your file, Wow 10 years that’s a while Don’t despair manner ere Any default or discrepancies you be out immediately No punishment without law You do the crime, you do the time Respect for private and family life A you know me, A you know …

ANONYMOUS MESSAGE TO AUSTRALIA & ITS GOVERNMENT MISSING Human Rights GREETINGS CITIZENS OF AUSTRALIA WE ARE ANONYMOUS. In Australia we are saturated with US media, and we’ve heard a lot of American ideas like the Freedom of Speech. We sometimes hear our fellow Australians speak about THEIR right to free speech. But like the Hollywood dreams we’ve watched since childhood, this is a fallacy. Australians DO NOT have the right to freedom of speech and we never have. The Australian Constitution does not have any express provision relating to freedom of speech. There is no list of personal rights or freedoms which may be enforced in the courts. Moves have been made towards the adoption of a Bill of Rights for Australia, predictably however our Government that is stalling. On 10 December 2008 the Rudd government announced a nationwide Consultation to examine the protection and promotion of human rights and responsibilities in Australia, so the National Human Rights Consultation Committee was appointed. On 8 October 2009 the Commonwealth Attorney-General released the Committee’s highly anticipated report. After widespread public engagement, the Committee found overwhelming community support for a Human Rights Act. The Australian government said it would respond to the report by the end of 2009. That was 2 years ago. AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL SAYS IN REGARD TO AUSTRALIA: “In recent times we have seen how human rights are vulnerable to being undermined by government policies, such as …

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE Please visit: www.ggnonline.com for the latest news commentary by Global Government News. Please donate to GGN www.paypal.com because it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. HEADLINES WITH LINKS: Who Voted Romney? NO ONE Raises Their Hand! But Romney Got The Most Votes…? bit.ly Who are “sovereign citizens”? bit.ly Sovereign Citizen Movement (ADL) bit.ly Sovereign citizen movement bit.ly Sovereign Citizens A Growing Domestic Threat to Law Enforcement (FBI) 1.usa.gov Domestic Terrorism 1.usa.gov Sovereign Citizens Are Extremists Watched By FBI huff.to FBI warns of threat from anti-government extremists reut.rs Homeland Security: You’re All ‘Militia Extremists’ Now bit.ly US ‘no-fly’ list of suspected terrorists doubles in 12 months bit.ly Militia trial starts in Michigan with jury picks bit.ly Under the Jackboot of an American Secretary General, INTERPOL Now Tracking Dissidents bit.ly FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. DDarko2012 is making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who …

The UN is working through local and state governments to micro manage every aspect of our lives. Partnering with corporate interests and using the power of government to regulate and control, all in the name of environmentalism and sustainable development, they are currently attacking property rights, American sovereignty, and individual freedom! We must work together to resist this unprecedented threat!

This is a video of Judge Andrew Napolitano’s speech about freedom, our rights and Federal Government abuse of them. The Judge explains the hard core truth about the Constitution and why we must fight to regain and retain our freedoms.

The need for a state – a single authority of law and government, with exclusive jurisdiction over some territory – is a basic assumption of much political theory and popular discourse. Tom Palmer challenges this common prejudice, and makes the case for non-coercive institutions in place of a central monopoly in law, as at present. Vice President of the Cato Institute and General Director of the Atlas Global Initiative, Dr Tom Palmer is a prominent libertarian activist. He has recently published an edited collection of his essays, Realizing Freedom: Libertarian Theory, History and Practice, which defends libertarianism from its critics and ably sets out, with one eye on history, the case for individual freedom and property rights. Recorded at Christ Church, University of Oxford, on 19th October 2009.

HELP ME END MARIJUANA PROHIBITION BY RATING SHARING THESE VIDEOS LEGALIZE CANNABIS MEDICAL MARIHUANA WEED 420 HIGH OBAMA RON PAUL PIPE BONG JOINT KUSH DRUG WAR SEEDS News VAPORIZER BOWL HASHISH BLUNTS HASH GANJA HEMP legal cops POT PRIVACY CIVIL RIGHTS LAW ACTIVIST HERB smoke HIGHTIMES COLLAPSE MEXICAN CARTELS PATRIOTS MARYJANE conservative Libertarian Liberal NEW YORK JERSEY CHRONIC freedom ALEX JONES PRISON INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX toke Sinsemilla MSNBC CNN cbs fox wikileaks cancer ABC IAMHEMP420