I am neither Democrat nor Republican I have no political affiliation. The way I see it there is no good side there both the same. I just express my comments based on the way I feel. Follow us on twitter!
On the Wednesday, May 2 edition of the Alex Jones Show, Alex talks about the Osama bin Laden assassination hoax perpetuated by the government and other topics. Alex also covers the latest ominous warnings over CISPA, the internet spying bill working its way through Congress, and the denial of Cass Sunstein as he tries to run away from his past and his call to infiltrate the truth movement. He takes calls for members of the military. Alex also covers the latest news and takes your calls. www.infowars.com www.prisonplanet.tv twitter.com www.facebook.com
America: Freedom to Fascism is a 2006 film by Aaron Russo, which alleges among a variety of claims that income tax is illegal. The documentary covers many subjects, including: the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the income tax, Federal Reserve System, national ID cards (REAL ID Act), human-implanted RFID tags (Spychips), Diebold electronic voting machines, globalization, Big Brother, taser weapons abuse, and the alleged use of terrorism by government as a means to diminish the citizens’ rights. The Film Determined to find the law that requires American citizens to pay income tax, producer Aaron Russo set out on a journey to find the evidence. This film which is neither left, nor right-wing is a startling examination of government. It exposes the systematic erosion of civil liberties in America since 1913 when the Federal Reserve system was fraudulently created. Mirror: Originally Uploaded by mysticdave666 on Jan 14, 2011 Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
URGENT! OBAMA Signs Anti-Protest Bill – FREE SPEECH & Protest will get you JAIL TIME! The First Amendment to the Constitution prohibits the government from infringing upon the freedom of speech, the freedom of association and the freedom to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Speech is language and other forms of expression; and association and petition connote physical presence in reasonable proximity to those of like mind and to government officials, so as to make your opinions known to them. The Declaration of Independence recognizes all three freedoms as stemming from our humanity. So, what happens if you can speak freely, but the government officials at whom your speech is aimed refuse to hear you? And what happens if your right to associate and to petition the government is confined to areas where those of like mind and the government are not present? This is coming to a street corner near you. Certain rights, like thought and privacy and travel, can be exercised on their own. You don’t need the government to cooperate with you; you just need to be left alone. Other rights, like those intended to influence the political process, require that the government not resist your exercise of them. Remember the old one-liner from Philosophy 101: If a tree falls in a forest and no one is there, does it make any noise? Here’s the contemporary version of that: If you can criticize the government, but it refuses to hear you, does your exercise of the freedom of …
Implied malice aforethought … Such tactics have no place in a democracy. Yet Kozinski, Matz, and the LAPD has yet to condemn them. And by this silence, they signal tacit approval and encourage further abuses. See: Chief of Police sends cop to censor reporter at 12:30 am: news.google.com A quote from Judge Alex Kozinski: Liberty — the freedom from unwarranted intrusion by government — is as easily lost through insistent nibbles by government officials who seek to do their jobs as by those who sole purpose it is to oppress; the piranha can be as deadly as the shark. Darcy, sorry you “hate” the Internet. And that you somehow feel that I “made you” hate the Internet. See that X in the top upper right of your screen? Click it and see what happens. Or, visit a medical doctor for an “eval.” Better yet, skip the eval and go for “treatment.” You have to!! It’s prudent. Probably. You can tell Alvin and Alex that I made you!! Who controls the past, controls the present. PRESENT: www.thecopwhisperer.com PRESENT www.citmedialaw.org Updates on Twitter @killercopDOTcom @DarcyTheCensor @AhowardMatz @AlexKozinski 42 USC § 1986 : US Code – Section 1986: Action for neglect to prevent conspiracy 42 USC § 1985 : US Code – Section 1985: Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights 42 USC § 1983 : US Code – Section 1983: Civil action for deprivation of rights Kozinski said the reason for allowing the cameras was to help the public “develop enhanced confidence in the rule of law.” Having …
2011 could have been named the year of the cell phone camera. Individuals everywhere have used their cell phones or other electronic devices to record interactions with the police. Some States have taken offense to that and have allowed police officers to arrest people for documenting events in public. In 2011, the First Circuit Court of Appeals out of Massachusetts ruled in favor of citizens first amendment rights to record in public. The Court has jurisdiction over MA, NH, RI, ME, and Puerto Rico. Here’s the ruling: www.ca1.uscourts.gov *** Some excerpts: “[I]s there a constitutionally protected right to videotape police carrying out their duties in public? Basic First Amendment principles, along with case law from this and other circuits, answer that question unambiguously in the affirmative.” “Glik filmed the defendant police officers in the Boston Common, the oldest city park in the United States and the apotheosis of a public forum. In such traditional public spaces, the rights of the state to limit the exercise of First Amendment activity are ‘sharply circumscribed.’” “[A] citizen’s right to film government officials, including law enforcement officers, in the discharge of their duties in a public space is a basic, vital, and well-established liberty safeguarded by the First Amendment.” “Gathering information about government officials in a form that can readily be disseminated to others serves a cardinal First Amendment interest in protecting and promoting ‘the …
The right to speak freely is vital to the protection and preservation of the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Subject to the limitations of liberty, this invaluable right makes it possible for the people to limit the government, and also enables representative government.
Ron Paul fights for the freedom of every American at a time in our history when our liberty is under terrible threat from our own government. With unprecedented new legislation that both major parties heavily endorse, such as the “USA Patriot Act”, and the “National Defense Authorization Act” signed into law on December 31, 2011, there has never been a better time to peacefully restore our Republic and the most precious rights guaranteed by our Constitution. The Establishment wants to silence the message of liberty for many monied interests, but the message is so good that it cannot be silenced by any amount of money. Don’t turn your back on the Bill of Rights. Don’t turn your back on the freedom of individuals. Ron Paul 2012 www.ronpaul2012.com
The First Amendment is one run-on sentence that enshrines five of the most essential liberties guaranteed by American democracy: the freedom of religion, the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the freedom of assembly, and the right to petition the government. The First Amendment is the core of all civil rights and civil liberties law in the United States
Please visit my blog: propaganda-buster.blogspot.com A couple living in Idaho attempting to develop their land to build a home on it, filled that land with dirt. Apparently this was a violation of federal law according to the EPA — Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA is claiming they filled in a wetland on their private property resulting in a 000 a day fine. Private property rights in these here United States of America is dead. The goal of environmentalist and the EPA is to cripple capitalism and violate private property rights in the USA — United States of America. There was plenty of progress in the USA before the EPA and now with the EPA progress is dead. It is such a tragedy to drain a swamp or wetland? Really? Tell that to the Ancient Romans. The Romans never met a swamp they did not like to drain. All over the Empire Roman engineers drained swamps and wet lands for progress. The built roads, aqueducts, sewer systems, coliseums, and some 2000 years later the environment still exist in Europe. If the EPA existed during the growth of the USA we would have never seen the Hoover Dam, the transcontinental railroad, the Interstate Highway system, and other major works. The EPA is an affront to the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution and basically liberties. – Link to article torn in this video: www.google.com wetlands wet lands drain swamp environmental protection agency EPA environmentalist anti capitalist “anti capitalism” 10th Amendment “tenth …
